Oklahoma House Bill 1137: A Step Forward or a Step Back for MMIP Efforts?

The crisis of Murdered and Missing Indigenous Persons (MMIP) is one of the most pressing issues facing Native communities across the United States. In Oklahoma, where a significant Native American population resides, addressing this crisis requires not only resources but also strong policies that support investigations, victim services, and prevention initiatives. However, a new bill introduced in the Oklahoma legislature, House Bill 1137 (HB 1137), proposes changes that could impact how the state handles funding related to MMIP efforts.

What Is HB 1137?

Introduced by Representative Stewart in the 2025 legislative session, HB 1137 seeks to remove certain federal funding and grant requirements from state government operations related to MMIP. While the bill aims to streamline state processes by eliminating federal stipulations tied to funding, this proposal raises concerns about the future of crucial MMIP programs in Oklahoma.

Potential Implications of HB 1137

The bill’s supporters argue that removing federal conditions allows Oklahoma to have greater autonomy over how funds are allocated and used. In theory, this could lead to faster decision-making, less bureaucratic red tape, and more localized control over MMIP-related initiatives. However, critics worry that this move may jeopardize critical federal funding that supports investigations, victim services, and law enforcement training.

Here are some key concerns:

1. Loss of Federal Funding for MMIP Programs

Many MMIP initiatives in Oklahoma rely on federal grants, such as those from the Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), and the Office of Violence Against Women (OVW). These funds help state and tribal law enforcement agencies coordinate their efforts, provide resources for victims’ families, and support data collection on missing persons. If the state removes federal requirements, Oklahoma could lose access to these funds, potentially weakening MMIP investigations and victim support services.

2. Impact on Tribal and State Partnerships

The MMIP crisis is a complex issue requiring collaboration between tribal, state, and federal agencies. Many federal grants come with built-in requirements for partnerships between state law enforcement and tribal governments, ensuring that Indigenous communities have a seat at the table. By rejecting these federal stipulations, HB 1137 could undermine these collaborations, making it harder for tribal nations to access support and resources.

3. Accountability and Oversight Concerns

Federal grants often include accountability measures that ensure funds are spent effectively and reach those who need them most. If Oklahoma removes these requirements, there could be less oversight on how MMIP resources are used, leading to concerns about transparency and effectiveness.

4. MMIP Efforts Need More Support, Not Less

Indigenous women and girls in Oklahoma face one of the highest rates of violence and disappearances in the country. With limited resources already stretched thin, any reduction in funding could slow down investigations, reduce community outreach efforts, and leave families without critical support. Instead of scaling back on federal funding requirements, many advocates argue that Oklahoma should be pushing for more funding and stronger MMIP policies.

Where Does HB 1137 Stand?

As of now, HB 1137 is still under consideration and has not been enacted into law. The bill will need to go through legislative committees and multiple votes before reaching the governor’s desk. Advocates, tribal leaders, and community members still have time to voice their concerns and push for policies that strengthen, rather than weaken, MMIP efforts.

What Can You Do?

• Stay Informed: Follow updates on HB 1137 through official legislative tracking sites.

• Contact Your Representatives: Let lawmakers know how important MMIP funding and policies are for Native communities in Oklahoma.

• Support Tribal-Led MMIP Efforts: Many Indigenous-led organizations work tirelessly to address this crisis—supporting them can make a difference.

• Share Awareness: The more people understand the stakes, the stronger the advocacy efforts will be.

Final Thoughts

The MMIP crisis demands a coordinated, well-funded response, not policies that risk reducing resources. While HB 1137’s goal of streamlining processes may seem beneficial on paper, the potential loss of federal funding and oversight raises serious concerns. Oklahoma must prioritize Indigenous communities' safety by ensuring that any policy changes enhance, rather than weaken, efforts to address MMIP cases.

What are your thoughts on HB 1137? Do you believe it will help or harm MMIP efforts in Oklahoma? Let’s continue the conversation.

Facebook: @411Cherokee